Karl Jerr
Herzack Unit
121
   |
Posted - 2016.11.05 14:23:15 -
[1] - Quote
'Pussy' (because of my bad positive security status according to you) lowbear here 
Beast of Revelations wrote:
(...)Whenever I come here I always see insults of 'carebear' thrown around. As we all know, this insult normally comes from a low-sec pirate type or null-sec corp. guy (someone who envisions himself as an elite PvP'er), and is directed to some 'other' type who is stereotypically a high-sec miner(...)
Let's cut through the B.S. What this boils down to is someone who proclaims to be an Eve 'tough guy' calling another player a 'pussy.' Before I go further, let me be explicit and state unequivocally that I am completely and 100% neutral as far as tough guy-ism or pussy-ism. (...) If a guy wants to be (or is) a pussy (a high-sec miner type or whatever) - great. And if the tough guy wants to prey on the pussy, to berate him, to call him names - I'm 100% fine with that too.(...)
But what I am here to do is to ferret out hypocrisy. You see, there are far too many self-proclaimed but false 'tough-guys' here - guys who proclaim to be tough guys but are in fact pussies. "Pussies in wolves' clothing" if you will. It is this that I object to.
Do you know these "insults" are part of the game? Why an "evil" pirate shouldn't smack talk?
If you don't take it into the first degree, and keep it in the context of a game.
And in low and I suppose null too there aren't victims, because it's funny for ex to see a pirate "raging" because us bears use cloakies and bookmarks 
Well, with this long ranting your neutrality has faded away, and even more by treating high sec miners of pussies.
It' s a complete paradox and sound like a troll post.
You continue call and judge others, is it better than self-proclamed people in this game? nope.
Beast of Revelations wrote:(...) Rather, the goal here is to target the hypocrite - the false tough guy wanna-be, the pussy disguised as a tough guy. I would hope that the true tough guys out there would support ferreting out the pussies dwelling within their ranks. And again, if any or all of these things have been beaten like a dead horse a thousand times over, ignore this thread.(...)
1) Remove ship insurance for low-sec and null-sec. (...)
They can continue to procure insurance for their mining vessels or whatever. True tough guys should be unaffected as well. True tough guys don't want and don't need pussy insurance, and indeed don't carry pussy insurance, not only because 'insurance is for pussies,' but because it also screws up risk/reward, action/consequence, etc. For the true tough guy, if you live by the sword, you shall accept the risk of dying by the sword. For the true tough guy, there are no safe places in Eve.
Insurance is irrelevant, at least for me a lowbear dweller. My insurance is to have an emergency fund like in RL and don't fly what I cannot afford to lose.
We are all nerds here, I find more relevant to see behaviors out a video game than in a video game.
Beast of Revelations wrote:2) Remove clone jumping from low-sec and null-sec, and also from low-security individuals. Meaning A) clone jumping can only happen from high-sec to high-sec, and B) low-security individuals cannot clone jump at all.
Apart to be a waste of time and a PITA, it changes nothing else.
3) Remove safe logout/logoff from low-sec and null-sec, and from low-security individuals.
Again I don't see the critical thing...Do you think that null and low sec dwellers only jump clone and never fly in low/nulll?
It would prove nothing...
Beast of Revelations wrote:4) No free noob ships in low-sec, null-sec, nor for low-security individuals.
LOL
For sure, the one ratting with their carriers in low and null will be affected 
Better and better.
Beast of Revelations wrote:It is the pussy in tough-guy disguise
repeated ad nauseum, and you said you were neutral, yeah right 
You seem to be what you call for, since the endless judging through this post |